Category Archives: Shared Name/Shared Love

Shared Name/Shared Love #4: ‘Black History Month’

Welcome back to the Shared Name/Shared Love series – those posts in which I take a brace of identically-titled songs and explains why I love each of them (and then usually why I love one slightly more than the other). In Episode Four, things get a bit racial… Well, not really.

Death From Above 1979 – ‘Black History Month’
from:
You’re a Woman, I’m a Machine [2004]
Saul Williams – ‘Black History Month’
from:
The Inevitable Rise and Liberation of NiggyTardust! [2007]
Death From Above 1979 - You're a Woman, I'm a Machine Saul Williams - The Inevitable Rise and Liberation of NiggyTardust!

Like many, I imagine, Death From Above 1979 first greeted my ears with the string-scraping intro to ‘Romantic Rights’. They sounded great. Plus they had added novelty value with their line-up: there were just two members, but unlike the White Stripes, it was a bassist and a drummer – no guitar – and the drummer did the singing.

Soon after that initial exposure, I went out to make a purchase.  I can’t remember when this was exactly. It was sometime in 2004. Definitely prior to the release of their debut album – which came out in October that year. But it can’t have been too long before, as it was in video form that I encountered ‘Romantic Rights’ – and the version in the video is the album version (as opposed to this version from the Romantic Rights EP, which I just heard for the first time right now – released very early in 2004). The Internet doesn’t seem to know when the video came out. I’m fairly sure it was before they had to append the 1979 to their original name (because of a dispute with James Murphy’s DFA Records) too.

Anyway… at some point in the middle of 2004, I went out to make a purchase of whatever Death From Above release I could find. And all I could find was the Heads Up EP. It kicked ass – particularly the opener, ‘Dead Womb’ and the outstanding ‘Do It!’. It still kicks ass. It’s quick, but relentless. Every song is a short, sharp blast.

Reframed by this hitherto unknown frenetic earlier release, ‘Romantic Rights’ actually lost a bit of its edge. It is, relative to the EP, a softer song. But this wasn’t necessarily a bad thing. It felt more well-rounded and accomplished. It made me suspect the band had more to offer. I became excited at the prospect of hearing a full-length album.

I got the album, You’re a Woman, I’m a Machine, upon its release. And I was not disappointed. The general level of energy, though inevitably down from Heads Up (which probably wouldn’t have been sustained over an album anyway), was still high, with a great opener and a firecracker of a second single. And there was some subtle variety too, though mostly staying within the bounds of ‘Romantic Rights’.

Except for the real surprise – the album’s most subdued, contemplative song, placed smack bang in the middle of the album (okay, so “subdued” and “contemplative” are relative terms. It’s still fairly loud. But it’s a restrained kind of loud…). And it was called ‘Black History Month’:

YouTube Preview Image

Actually, what I like most about this song are the lyrics. This is rare for me. I can’t recall if I’ve gone into detail in any of these posts about not being a lyrics person. But, yeah, I am not a lyrics person. For me, the words are almost always the least important element of a song, especially when it comes to first listens. However, there are always instances of words slowly coming to the fore. And some exceptional cases where they jump out at me.

I don’t know if the lyrics to ‘Black History Month’ jumped, exactly, but I was quick to latch on to them.

Do you remember a time when this pool was
A great place for waterwings and cannonballs?

Perhaps nostalgia and regret speak to me?

The lyrics don’t seem to have anything to do with Black History Month, though. Apparently, the song is so-titled simply because it was written in a February – February being Black History Month. Not that I knew that, as I did not grow up in North America. (Nor am I black… but I definitely think it’s more to do with not living in the US or Canada.) Two white guys doing a song about Black History Month would probably be a bit weird anyway.

Saul Williams‘s ‘Black History Month’, on the other hand, was always going to be a more likely candidate to relate to the titular month – the black experience frequently being subject matter in Mr Williams’s work. A quick listen to the incredible ‘Black Stacey’ will give you an idea, if you are unfamiliar.

I mentioned that I am not a lyrics person. As you would imagine, I am not much of a poetry or spoken-word person, either. And all this has undoubtedly contributed to my relative lack of enthusiasm for hip-hop – I rarely focus on lyrics, so why focus on music in which lyrics are the focus? (Teenage me’s guitars-only rule probably also played a big part.)

It’s highly unlikely that I would have ever gotten in any way entangled with Saul Williams’s material had it not been for a certain Mr Trent Reznor. At that Nine Inch Nails gig in Glasgow, Saul Williams opened the show, having been invited by Reznor to join him on his European tour. His performance was electrifying – and very well-received by the audience, which consisted almost entirely of dour-looking pasty-faced goths, remember. The aforementioned ‘Black Stacey’ stood out. So did the enthralling ‘List of Demands (Reparations)’.

Soon, word on the NIN grapevine was that TR and SW were collaborating on something while on the road.  That something turned out to be the next Saul Williams album (his third), dubbed The Inevitable Rise and Liberation of NiggyTardust!, released online (for either zero or five dollars – I was scabby and went with the free version. Sorry Saul. And Trent) in November 2007.

On its surface level, this is Nine Inch Nails fronted by a hip-hop artist (like How To Destroy Angels is, superficially, NIN with a lady vocalist). That alone makes it a fascinating prospect. But the level of collaboration and integration goes much further – even deeper than Trent’s dalliance with Dr Dre (ho ho ho). The resulting blend of styles yields quite a unique album.

Some highlights include ‘Break’ and ‘WTF!’. They do a pretty interesting version of U2′s ‘Sunday Bloody Sunday’, too. But for me, the best track is the very first track. A raucous call to arms to open the show:

YouTube Preview Image

Of course, these lyrics do nothing but jump at you. They attack:

Can you feel it? Nothing can save you
I’m tougher than bullets so, baby, pray to your savior
I never been shot, but I bet you I’m braver
I’m taking my spot, nigga, I ain’t afraid to…

But the backing track isn’t passive either: driven by violent, distorted, degraded, pummeling loops. And then, for the refrain, a chorus of dehumanized, manipulated backing vocals “chime” in. Next to this, the DFA79 track seems even more subdued.

Then two minutes in there is this bizarre eye-of-the-storm break. One of the oddly shifted vocals loops persistently in the left channel while Saul unleashes line after line, somehow covering a couple of millennia in about three-quarters of a minute. Before all those voices return for the end.

It’s a thrilling piece of work. So thrilling that it probably does the rest of the album a disservice, by obliterating the listener before the other songs even have a chance.

Listening now, it has kind of obliterated Death From Above 1979′s song’s chance of remaining in my mind. When it comes to this direct head-to-head, I think DFA79′s relative restraint is their undoing, as Saul’s track’s power dominates.

Or am I wrong? Which ‘Black History Month’ does it for you? Have your say:


Shared Name/Shared Love #3: ‘Stockholm Syndrome’

Shared Name/Shared Love: a series looking at pairs of songs I like, both with the same name. In this, the third installment, we have a band I know I should love, but still haven’t really got around to it – and a band I didn’t like, then liked and am now a bit indifferent to…

Yo La Tengo – ‘Stockholm Syndrome’
from:
I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One [1997]
Muse – ‘Stockholm Syndrome
from:
Absolution [2003]
Yo La Tengo - I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One Muse - Absolution

I first became aware of Yo La Tengo, around the time their Summer Sun album came out in 2003. I remember reading a couple of articles about them, being intrigued by the band’s name and some mentions of Sonic Youth. But the intrigue was not enough to get me to pick up the album.

They remained on the outskirts of my radar, their name popping up on music sites every so often. I built up a picture of them in my mind. They seemed to have a reputation for having great versatility, a good sense of humour, for being a great live act, etc. Everyone seemed to think they were brilliant. I had no reason to doubt this, I just didn’t have that impetus to dive in.

The deadlock broke a couple of years after first hearing about them, when I spotted their best-of compilation Prisoners of Love on special offer in Tower Records. The collection had 26 tracks from 1985-2003, spread over two discs (there is also three-disc version – the third CD dedicated to rarities). I brought it home and prepared to have my first ever Yo La Tengo listening experience.

‘Stockholm Syndrome’ is track five on the first disc. To be honest, on first listen, it did not stand out for me at all. I instantaneously latched on to the noisier numbers, like ‘Sugarcube’ and ‘From a Motel 6′ - and fell in love with their delicate cover of George McRae’s ‘You Can Have It All’. But after repeated listens, ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ began to shine through.

YouTube Preview Image

To be fair, it is – on first impression – quite a subdued, downbeat song. It chugs along sedately at first, with James McNew’s plaintive vocal questioning “what’s the matter?” It sounds pleasant and simple enough, but nothing particularly spectacular.

The magic really starts with the chorus, when McNew reaches for the higher notes, with Georgia Hubley’s husky backing vocals coming in underneath.  The blend of their voices is sublime. And then, out of nowhere, we get a bruising, distorted lead guitar crashing in for a brief solo. The song is then inverted, going back to the chorus and finishing with another sombre verse. The palindromic structure reflects the heartbreak that comes from having gained something, built it up – and then losing it. Or something like that…

Despite really liking that compilation. I never really went on to become a full-on Yo La Tengo fan. I’m still not really sure why. The potential is still there. I just need to find some time…

When Muse first showed up, I loathed them. This was around the time MTV2 had launched – and we finally had a channel constantly playing “alternative” music. Unfortunately, it did feature a bit of nu-metal Papa Roach/Limp Bizkit shite – and then it kept showing videos from this three-piece English band with a really whiny lead singer who did loads of masturbatory guitar stuff. And the videos themselves were so annoying, with their heavy-handed concepts of girls seeing shit in mirrors or getting lost in anonymous buildings or – most irritating of all – that one with everyone crying their eyes out.

Things obviously got worse when everyone started heaping praise on them and making them really popular. People went nuts over the first single from their second album and I couldn’t understand it. The vocals were even whinier and the guitar parts even wankier. Ugh.

The first chink in my armour appeared when they came out with ‘New Born’. I really wanted to hate it – and thought I was going to be vindicated when the song opened up with a minute long intro of Matt Bellamy wailing over a twinkly piano part. But then that riff kicked in. I couldn’t help it. It was undeniably brilliant. Damn them!

I had a soft spot for the next single, ‘Bliss’, but with ‘Hyper Music’ and that grating cover of ‘Feeling Good’, I could comfortably go back to disliking/trying to ignore them.

And then, sometime in the summer of 2003, probably not too long after I was first reading about Yo La Tengo, they came out with the first single of their third album. And it kicked my arse:

YouTube Preview Image
(embedding disabled on the official video, you can see it here – though it’s a bit meh, so…)

I’m not sure exactly what it is about this track that got to me. I mean, all the ingredients are pretty much the same things that pissed me off about them all along. But it all just came together brilliantly. For once, the shreddy, wanky guitar and the moany shrieking vocals served the song, elevating it to some higher level. And that line in the chorus, “this is the last time I’ll abandon you.” – simple, powerful.

I ended up getting – and liking – the Absolution album. And the album after that too. I even went to see them live in Fukuoka. And enjoyed it. But then they went and released The Resistance and made it difficult to keep liking them. Sadly.

Re-listening to the two ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ songs back-to-back, it’s tricky to pick one over the other. They’re two completely different types of song. The Muse track packs much more of a punch. But then Yo La Tengo’s, guitar solo excepted, isn’t really aiming for a punch. It’s wrenching power vs low-key subtlety.

I think I might have to go with Muse’s, simply due to its ability to actually induce a sort of Stockholm syndrome in me – where I actually began to have positive feelings for a band that had held me hostage with tracks that had irritated me so.

What do you reckon yourselves?


Shared Name/Shared Love #2: ‘Zero’

Welcome to the second episode of Shared Name/Shared Love. In this series, I examine pairs of songs I like which happen to have the exact same name. In this edition, I look at two singles from two different bands’ third albums.

[Don't forget to vote for your favourite of the two in the poll below!]
[And go vote in the last post's poll, while you're at it!]

The Smashing Pumpkins – ‘Zero’
from:
Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness [1995]
Yeah Yeah Yeahs – ‘Zero
from:
It’s Blitz! [2009]
The Smashing Pumpkins - Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness Yeah Yeah Yeahs - It's Blitz!

I was very late in the game getting into The Smashing Pumpkins, only starting to pay significant attention to them around 2001, just after the band had broken up. It was almost the exact opposite of the traditional music snob “I was into them before everyone else was” scenario. Yeah, I’m more into the post-snobbery, where I only like things after everyone else has stopped liking them – or has forgotten about them. Which is why I think Machina/The Machines of God was by far their best album…

But seriously, Machina is actually quite good, though without a doubt below the standard set by the band’s second and third albums, Siamese Dream [1993] and Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness [1995]. The former slipped by me at the time. It’s possible – likely, even – that I saw the videos for ‘Today’ and ‘Disarm’ on MTV, but they didn’t resonate with me. Whether that was because they just didn’t appeal or because they weren’t shown that often, I’m not sure.

There was no escaping the first two singles released from Mellon Collie, though. The videos for ‘Bullet With Butterfly Wings’ and ’1979′ were ubiquitous. And while I liked them (the first a lot more than the second), I wasn’t pushed to get the album at all. This apathy continued even when the video for the album’s fourth single seemed to take over my television entirely.

Eventually, I would go back and get those records. On top of appreciating them as a listener, they also formed a key part in the development of my guitar playing. And one particular standout was track four on the first of Mellon Collie‘s two discs – a song which had been the album’s third single, whose release at the time I managed to miss entirely. That song was ‘Zero’:

YouTube Preview Image

There were no complex reasons behind my love for this song. It, very straightforwardly, ticked all the requisite boxes. It was loud. It was heavy. It rocked. Billy Corgan’s voice – occasionally an issue for me – was deployed most appropriately, his snarl mirroring the cutting guitar riffs and distorted harmonics. Billy Corgan’s lyrics – very frequently and issue for me – also fit brilliantly.

It was a joy to play, too. It felt great to strap on an electric guitar, get the most overdrive and distortion I could muster and slash the strings to get that main part going. Mimicking the crazy solo parts without any pitch shift/octave guitar pedals (or actually being able to play them…) proved a lot trickier. But it wasn’t hard to thrash out some chaotic noise that fit the part.

Another reason ‘Zero’ will always have a place in my  heart is that it was one of the first songs I ever played solo in front of an audience. During Freshers’ Week in my first year of university (in 2002), I went to one of the many college societies’ ongoing receptions, at which there was a sort of open mic thing. And so I, on an acoustic guitar no less, had a go at spitting out this song. While it wasn’t a smash success, I definitely didn’t embarrass myself, which is probably the best I could have hoped for back then.

It wasn’t too long after that “event” that I came to know Yeah Yeah Yeahs. Unlike the Pumpkins, I got in with them more or less on the ground floor. True, I didn’t get too involved in the early hype that surrounded their self-titled debut and Machine, but I’d say I could claim a decent amount of indie snob points having picked up Fever to Tell in the summer of 2003, long before ‘Maps’ made most folk sit up and take notice.

Fever to Tell is due to appear in my Top Ten Albums of 2000-2009 series, having claimed the #4 spot in my original list, so I won’t go into any depth about it here. Needless to say, I loved it. And I will also say that a massive chunk of that love was specifically down to Nick Zinner’s use of the electric guitar.

I believe it was the decreased prominence of that instrument on the band’s second album, Show Your Bones, that caused some people to be less enthusiastic about it. It was definitely a more subtle affair. In some cases, this may have been to the detriment of the album, but it also delivered some amazing tracks. In particular, the album’s last track, ‘Turn Into’, is spectacular, moving from delicate fragility to grandeur and joy and back, closing the album perfectly (I’ve talked about this briefly before…).

The Is Is EP might have suggested the band was heading back towards its earlier sound, but when their third album, It’s Blitz! eventually came out, it revealed they had moved even further afield, with the guitars of Fever (electric) and Bones (acoustic and electric) seemingly giving way to an army synths and disco beats.

The album’s shift was heralded by its first single, ‘Zero’:
YouTube Preview Image

Dynamics-wise, it actually shares a bit with ‘Turn Into’. It has that subdued first verse, teasing you along before then kicking in. And it also has a moment where Zinner’s lead guitar bursts into the song, having been sidelined for two minutes and 15-20 seconds. But while ‘Turn Into’ has a more measured vocal climax, arriving in the bridge when Karen O sings: “I’ll fall right in to keep you out / I’d like to tell you all about it.”, ‘Zero’ peaks more literally – and more frequently – in each chorus, as she squeals the “crying, crying, crying” and “climb, climb, climb” parts, hitting the spot each time. Yes.

As for choosing between the two songs. Well, the Yeah Yeah Yeahs track is far more inline with my current listening habits and tastes. Being released much more recently is bound to help that. Likewise, the Smashing Pumpkins’ ‘Zero’ obviously trumps the Yeah Yeah Yeahs’ on nostalgia points.

I don’t think either does its job particularly better than the other.

SP’s ‘Zero’ still rocks hard and kicks a significant amount of bum and makes me want to jump up and down and bang my head.

YYYs’ ‘Zero’ still has its strutting swagger and makes me want to find the nearest dance floor and throw my shoulders back and move my hips and put my hands in the air.

Which of those two things do I want to do more – and more often? Almost certainly the latter. Perhaps I’ve lost my edge/dark side (if ever I had one), but these days I never really find myself “intoxicated with the madness” or “in love with my sadness”. I’m much much much more likely to want to “shake it like a ladder to the sun” and “climb, climb, climb higher”.

Though I’m still not sure about putting leather on…

Anyway. I’m going with the Yeah Yeah Yeahs for now, though I definitely still love the Smashing Pumpkins’ track. What do you think? Vote in the poll and leave a comment below:


Shared Name/Shared Love #1: ‘Machine Gun’

Welcome to Shared Name/Shared Love. In each edition of this series, I will highlight two identically-named, but otherwise different, songs – both of which I happen to like very much. To make things more competitive/interesting, you can vote for the one you like best in the poll below – after you read my waffle, of course.

First up:

Slowdive – ‘Machine Gun’
from:
Souvlaki [1993]Slowdive - Souvlaki
Portishead – ‘Machine Gun’
from:
Third [2008]Portishead - Third

Slowdive were part of the whole British “shoegaze” thing around the late-80s/early-90s, along with My Bloody Valentine and Ride. I missed this scene altogether at the time, as I was deep into my Guns N’ Roses phase. I wouldn’t get into My Bloody Valentine until 2002 or thereabouts. I loved their stuff, but it didn’t really spur me on to delving into the works of their contemporaries. My friend Eoin got Ride’s Nowhere and lent it to me. Yes, it was good, but it was no Loveless. It seemed MBV were going to be my one and only foray into the scene.

In the summer of 2008, I moved from Nagasaki to Hiroshima. The first musical ally I made there was Mr Jeremy Logue. During my time there, we had many sessions, performed live a few times and talked a LOT about music. In one of those numerous conversations, shoegaze was discussed. I was big into MBV and had never listened to Slowdive. He was the opposite, or thereabouts. Or maybe he had listened to MBV and didn’t like them that much. Or maybe he loved them. The main thing was he was (or had been) really into Slowdive – the Souvlaki album in particular. So I decided to give it a listen.

The album’s first song, ‘Alison’, was mentioned as the highlight in a couple of reviews I’d read. I was decidedly underwhelmed. Perhaps I was (unfairly) expecting to be bowled over ‘Only Shallow’-style. If that was the case, ‘Alison’ was destined to fail for me. Perhaps it was a reversal of expectations that then allowed me to be utterly blown away by ‘Machine Gun’. Or perhaps it’s just because it’s a fucking awesome track:

YouTube Preview Image

That massive, wide open sound at the start. Layers of Rachel Goswell’s vocals washing over me like in broad strokes across a grey sky. Or some other epic-sounding metaphor. And you couldn’t make out what she was singing, but it didn’t matter at all because it was just gorgeous. And then it changes. Quite radically, actually, but without diverging too much. An acoustic (?) guitar comes chugging in, matching the pulsating bass. Neil Halstead comes in, singing only slightly more comprehensible lyrics, then there’s this harmonious-but-still-jarring chord change, as he sings, “it’s all I need, yeah.” Then the wide open sound returns, with an overdriven electric guitar, later rejoined by Goswell’s multiple vocals.

The two parts go back and forth once more. Both are refrains/choruses of sorts. Each contribute something very different, but I can’t imagine the song being without either. They come together majestically. Transcendent.

Portishead, I was aware of more-or-less from the start, though I kept a bit of distance. I remember Dummy winning the Mercury Prize. I didn’t get the album then, though the song ‘Glory Box’ did manage to stick with me for a long time. I didn’t pay any attention when their second album came out, so, when they went on this long hiatus, nothing really changed as far as I was concerned. Around 2004, I was given a Portishead mix-CD which contained selections from the first two albums. I gave it a few listens. I liked it, too, though it all seemed quite same-y. I definitely wasn’t able to distinguish which songs were from which album – although, in fairness, the same could be said for songs from many bands’ first two albums.

Then, all of a sudden, they were back. Third came out in the spring of 2008, preceded by this beast:

YouTube Preview Image

If ‘Machine Gun’ had been on that mix-CD, I definitely would have spotted its strange origin. Beth Gibbons’s voice had gone from sultry – even jazzy to an extent- to …terrified(?) and verging operatic. If that wasn’t change enough, the music she was singing over was violently different. There was no scratchy vinyl-sounding drums; no strings; no brass; no “band”. In their place were this harsh, stuttering, crushing, electronic beats, pounding relentlessly. The percussion carries, as Gibbons tries to cling on.

When her vocal ends, the sound changes abruptly. Not the structure of the beat – but the sounds themselves. Like changing the font of a piece of text. The content is the exactly same, but so many other things change. And then they switch it again. And again. And that’s when the synths come in, playing us out like the outro music of some Blade Runner-esque sci-fi film. And then it ends.

The whole experience was – and remains – compelling. It’s a track built on tension. And it works. It also works well the title. More obviously than Slowdive’s does.

As for the tracks themselves, I’m not sure if I could choose between the two [which is funny, because I'm asking you to...]. They have very different places in my consciousness. The shoegazers’ might just have the edge. Listening to the two back to back, its sheer, expansive beauty sings to me more than the Portishead track’s taut claustrophobia. But that might just be because it’s late and I’m sleepy. It could be the other way come morning…

Honourable Mentions:

Lionel Richie’s old band Commodores released their first album in 1974. It was called Machine Gun and so was its instrumental first track (and single). It was first brought to my attention in the late 1990s, when it was used in Paul Thomas Anderson’s fantastic Boogie Nights - appropriately in a dance sequence. Fantastic tune indeed.

Jimi Hendrix also had a track called ‘Machine Gun’. It was first brought to my attention today, when I did an online search for other songs also named ‘Machine Gun’. Completely off my radar as I’m not a Hendrix fan. Not that I don’t like him, I’ve just never really listened to him. Kind of how I wouldn’t be a Pink Floyd or Smiths fan – just haven’t really given them a good listen. Yet. Anyway, I just listened to the Hendrix track. It seems quite epic. Perhaps I should give the man more of a chance.

Anyway, I’m leaving these other guns off the table for now. The choice is between the first two. Take your pick: