Category Archives: Controlled Explosions

Self-Retrospect #10: ‘Hair Clip Surprise’

Welcome once again to Self-Retrospect, a collection of reflective/narcissistic posts about my own musical meanderings.

In this edition, we go back to February 2006 and arrive at what would become the tenth, final and – in this non-objective listener’s opinion – best track on the Projects compilation: A quiet and simple little song about a lady’s hair accessory…

Hair Clip Surprise - Recording

Continuing the trend of the previous two years, the beginning of 2006 would see a further decline in my musical productivity. Unlike the approach of the Leaving Cert, which seemed to put my rate of writing and recording into overdrive, the months leading up to my final university exams were almost completely devoid of music-making.

My first recordings of the year didn’t appear until the end of February. And they were very bare-bones. Indeed, I appended the word ‘demo’ in parentheses to their titles, in a (kind of) lie to myself that I would flesh them out later. Perhaps I would incorporate some of the more intricate guitar work or electronic elements I’d edged towards in the recent (or, in the case of the latter, not so recent) past.

I was probably quite dismissive of them then, because at that time, I probably put more stock in arrangements and instrumentation. And these recordings just had some basic guitar and vocals – hence, were “incomplete”.

But it didn’t take me too long to realize that one of those tracks actually didn’t need any further development. It didn’t need any bells or whistles. Because, it really was – even in its spartan configuration – a fully-formed, proper song.

What I did not appreciate at first, is that it – all modesty aside – had a really good lyric. I’ve mentioned many times that, when it comes to my attention and appreciation of songs, words almost never supersede the music. Well, it seems this also clouded my ability to assess my own work. I can now look back and see that this was, up to that point, by far the best lyric I’d written. It might still be. Hilariously enough, it was one of the easiest ones to write, too.

On 12 February, 2006, at the end of the day, I wrote an entry in the page-per-day diary I kept at the time, recounting the day’s events – and one oddly amusing/amusingly odd event in particular. I knew immediately that there was a song in it. Having run out of space on that day’s “official” page, I flipped to the back and, without much thought, wrote the song. There was no hasty scribbling-out of lines or violent corrections. It just all came out like so:

Hair Clip Surprise - Lyrics

Despite the lack of labour that went into it, the lyric came out quite well-constructed. It actually had quite a sophisticated narrative structure (certainly moreso than previous “story-song” attempts): It had a scene-setting opening, followed by an explanatory flashback; it jumped back to present day, only to be met with a sudden twist (and then a little sting in the tail).

I left it alone for a couple of weeks. I wasn’t quite sure how I was going to make music out of it. There was no melody in my head when I wrote those words. And I didn’t have any instrumental works in progress with which I could match it (as I had done many times before).

In the end, I just picked up a guitar and started slowly strumming an A chord. I began to speak/sing/speak-sing the words over it. I switched to a D. And then back to A – just alternating between the two major chords. Then I used an E to punctuate the end of the verse. Three simple, basic chords: pure beginners’ stuff. It worked, though.

The only other decisive element was the injection of some simple dynamics to match the tone of the lyrics. The first verse was soft. The second verse was harder. And the final verse was soft – then hard (and then soft and then hard again at the very end). Nothing too complicated.

In hindsight, it seems very carefully planned and thought-out. But it just happened naturally. And out popped ‘Hair Clip Surprise’:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

[download 'hair clip surprise' mp3]

As I said, I wasn’t beaming with pride at first. I thought it was just a rough demo. One that probably didn’t deserve any further treatment.

It never got further treatment. But not because I didn’t think it deserved any. Just  none seemed to be required. It just worked.

The song came more into its own more in a live setting. Since most of the shows I was playing were just me with an acoustic guitar, it was ideal. It seemed to get a good response each time, too. (Although perhaps that’s some kind of wishful thinking/selective memory on my part.)

Here’s me doing it as part of a short set at Sin É in Dublin in April 2010. It’s a soundboard recording, so it didn’t really pick up the audience too well. Also, there were only about 6-8 people in said audience. Nevertheless, they seemed to like it. (Or were polite enough to clap anyway…)

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

[download 'Hair Clip Surprise (Live at Sin É)' mp3]

This post has definitely been a lot more self-congratulatory than the self-depreciating ones that preceded it. But, fuck it – I’m really proud of this song! I still think it’s one of the best things I’ve come up with.

And it marked a very important shift for me, with regards to subject matter.  The bulk of my earlier songs had been about unrequited desire, rejection and missed opportunities. Heck, that was, in many ways, a veritable treasure-trove of inspiration. I got a lot of mileage out of that kind of shit!

But after struggling to put feelings to words while still romantically entangled, I now a complete serious relationship  to draw upon - bitter end, aftermath and inevitable excruciating hindsight included.

This song paved the way for the David-somewhat-scathingly-looks-back-at-relationship-but-partially-disguises-it-as-a-pleasant-ditty sub-genre that would follow, yielding ‘Casual Trap’ and ‘Hard to Please’ – as well as this year’s ‘Requisitely Sensitive’ (which, in retrospect, now seems like a complete rip-off of this track!).  And really, where would we be without that?

Um, probably in the exact same place. But with slightly less bitterness in the world.

But anyway…

Top Ten Albums of 2000-2009: #1…

And so, we’ve finally reached the top. First, a quick recap/countdown/linkfest:

#10 – XTRMNTR
#9 – The Argument
#8 – Arular
#7 – Two Suns
#6 – White Blood Cells
#5 – They Were Wrong, So We Drowned
#4 – Fever to Tell
#3 – Funeral
#2 – Face Control

Leaving us with…

#1
Tegan and Sara
The Con
[2007]

Tegan and Sara - The Con

Tegan and Sara are a group consisting of a pair of twins (of the same name), both of whom happen to be gay (and Canadian). In media coverage, the whole “gay twins” angle gets brought up a lot. They’re never unwilling to discuss it, though they sometimes seem a bit miffed at having the focus moved away from their music. Which is understandable. However, were it not for the “gay twins” angle, they may never have entered my life.

In June 2008, I was completely oblivious to Tegan and Sara. I had never (and still haven’t ever) watched The L Word or Grey’s Anatomy – and the associations probably would have dissuaded me from giving them a chance, had I known about them – well, the latter one anyway. I had even somehow escaped ever hearing ‘Walking With a Ghost’. Then, during that month, I read a message board discussion on whether one twin being gay would mean a higher likelihood of the other being gay – essentially a discussion on the potential influence of genetics and upbringing on a person’s sexuality.

The instigator of that thread had brought it up after being exposed to some band that consisted of a pair of gay twins… In a fleeting moment of curiosity, I grabbed a copy of their then most recent album, which had been released the previous summer. It was called The Con.

When listening to an album for the first time, unless it’s the long-awaited new release of one of my favourite artists, or something I’ve already heard one or two tracks from and am very excited about, or something recommended to me by someone whose musical opinion I wholeheartedly trust, I don’t always give it my 100%, utmost, undivided, stop-everything-put-on-the-headphones attention.  Especially not if it’s an album I’ve acquired on a complete and utter whim.

In those situations, I usually put it on in the background and continue reading whatever it was I was reading, or doing the dishes, or whatever menial task is at hand. If it grabs me, it grabs me. If it’s not instantly offensive, I’ll give it another try or two later. But if it doesn’t hook me then, it’s possible that it could quickly fade into the recesses of my collection. It might only get a reprieve if I stumble across one of its tracks through a different medium – or if one catches me by surprise on a shuffle through library. So the “whim-got” albums have a tougher job to win me over. They don’t get as much benefit-of-the-doubt…

Listening to The Con for the first time, the first few tracks certainly did not offend me. It sounded pleasant enough. But nothing jolted me in a good way either. That was until the sixth of its 14 tracks burst upon my ears. This track (which I would later learn had been, very understandably, chosen as the album’s lead single) got a hold of me as soon as it started, with that opening piano melody jumping into my cranium:

YouTube Preview Image

It’s a truly infectious song. All of the elements conspire to make you powerless to resist it: A simple beat propels it on, with a shaker skittering about; the aforementioned piano hook punctuates the chorus lines as it pleasantly punctuates your skull; the bass – the song’s secret weapon – bounces up and down and all around; and even the lyric, ostensibly about a relationship, sounds like it’s speaking for song itself, saying it just wants to get (back) into our heads. And it does.

After encountering ‘Back In Your Head’, my attention was pretty rapt. I listened to the rest of the album. And then I went back and listened to it from the start again. And again. And again…

Each track was a winner. Of course, some were more immediate than others. One of the early favourites was the album’s title track, the third song on the album:

YouTube Preview Image

After more listens – along with inevitable obsessive reading up about the band – the differing personalities became more apparent. I had assumed, like many do, that they were quite a collaborative pair. But in fact, it was quite the opposite. The two wrote almost entirely independently of each other. And they recorded things in a fairly separate fashion too: Although they got additional personnel involved in the studio, many of the recordings only feature one sister. (Live, they perform together seamlessly, which sort of adds to the confusion…)

The default distinction is that Tegan is responsible for the more straightforward/rockier/poppier tracks, while Sara’s output tends to be more intricate/complex/subtle. There are, of course, some “uncharacteristic” exceptions, such as the poppiest track (‘Back In Your Head’) being a Sara song and Tegan having the two quietest numbers on the album.

But though I began to understand the differences between them more, I didn’t gravitate to either more than the other. It wasn’t like with Fugazi or Sonic Youth, where I tended to be more immediately drawn to a particular voice (though in those groups it did tend to be mainly just the vocalist that was different – and the bands wrote the music collectively). Instead, I could appreciate both – separately, but equally. ‘Twas a winning combination.

Later, my appreciation for their distinct styles, their distinct personalities, them as a group – and for the album specifically – would all be increased further when I watched The Con: The Movie, a making-of documentary that came on a DVD with the special edition of the album (which I would later get my hands on).

It’s funny in that I often find myself arguing that an artist’s music should stand on its own – and how one’s opinion of the music shouldn’t be coloured by how one feels about the artist. This usually comes up when talking about artists who are arseholes, but who sometimes produce top-quality music (Billy Corgan springs to mind).

But I broke my own rule with The Con. Watching that documentary allowed my to get to know Tegan and Sara and the dynamic between them – and then essentially just fell in love with them. And I think it actually made me love the album more. Highly illogical and irrational, but I believe that’s what happened.

I highly recommend seeking out the doc, even just as a general music-making-related piece of film. Here’s a sample (the “chapter” on Sara’s brooking track, ‘Like O, Like H’):

YouTube Preview Image

It took a while for a favourite individual track to appear. As with my #2 album of that decade, it was the last track on the album that took me the longest to fully appreciate it. But when I finally did, it superseded all the others. I still find it difficult to hear ‘Call It Off’ and not play it at least twice more.

It’s is one of those two quiet Tegan tracks on the album (also featuring Sara on backing vocals). It’s short, it’s simple, it’s sweet…

…and it’s also fitting way to end things – both the album and this series of posts!

YouTube Preview Image

Self-Retrospect #9: ‘Virgin-Like’

Episode 9 of Self-Retrospect, the series of posts in which Older David looks back at some of Younger David’s music. Sometimes with pride, but mostly with deep, deep shame…

After the barrage of musical activity in 2002, followed by the still-reasonably-productive 2003, things got a bit quiet. The main reason for this was my getting involved in a proper, serious, long-term relationship. This affected musical productivity in two significant ways:

  1. Time – spare time that would previously have been spent writing and recording music were now being filled in other ways.
  2. Subject matter – almost all of my material was based on unrequited attraction and feelings of inadequacy. I just wasn’t able – or didn’t have the urge – to write about the opposite kinds of feelings. Also, it’s a bit dicey writing songs about someone you’re going out with, because there’s a strong chance they might actually listen to them – and read into them.

So there wasn’t a huge quantity of material. And this, unfortunately, wasn’t compensated by any big surge in quality. When I compiled Projects, covering nearly five whole years of output, 80% of the tracks came from the first two of those years. The three-year stretch from June 2003 to June 2006 was represented by just two songs.

The first of these was a somewhat bizarre guitar-led track whose lyrical jumping-off point was the pair of dungarees I was wont to wear at the time.

Virgin-Like - Dungarees

I specifically mention the guitar, because there was a fair amount of non-guitar stuff happening at the time. After ‘Sentimental Baby’, there was a bit of keyboard stuff. Although actually, my main thing in late-2004/early-2005 (well, only thing, given how little I was doing at the time) was chopping up samples of older recordings. That and looping my voice. Key inspirations at the time were Liars’ They Were Wrong… (which I’ve written about before) and Björk’s Medúlla.

My first recording in 2005, entitled ‘Sewing Skills’, reflects these influences quite readily:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

[download 'Sewing Skills' mp3]

(Needless to say, that track didn’t make the cut for Projects, nor even my less-selective Selection compilation)

The dungaree song, though, brought guitars back into the fold. And in a way I hadn’t really done before, too. Most of my songs just had strummed chords or basic, rhythmic riffs. Any “lead” guitar was either some one-note accompaniment in later verses, or the occasional, very primitive guitar break/solo. This new song, though, had lead parts through almost the entire song, somewhat rudely intruding upon the vocals.

It sounded like this:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

[download 'Virgin-Like' mp3]

The title, ‘Virgin-Like’, was definitely a Madonna reference, but I can’t really remember why. In fact, I can’t really remember anything about how the lyrics came together. I know it started with the dungaree reference – and that the verses went through two or three different versions before I settled on the disjointed end result.

It seems quite easy to infer that it was all something sexual, but I really don’t think that’s what I was going for at all. Honestly, I’m not sure if there’s any coherent meaning in this one.

So just forget about it…?

Virgin-Like - Just forget about it

‘Virgin-Like’ was somewhat notable in being one of the first of my own songs I was able to perform confidently (and competently?) on stage. The first solo gig I did, I was very nervous and ended up forgetting loads of words and giggling as I sang. My second happened about a year later – and in the interim, I’d gained some live experience playing bass in a band. Accompanied by Mr Gerard Lynch on drums, I worked through my nerves on the first song of the night. And by the second, I think I was doing ok:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

[download 'Virgin-Like (Live)' mp3]

The song was also significant in that it aided my further forays into electronic music. Songs like ‘Sentimental Baby’ and ‘One-Sided’ involved electronic instrumentation. But they were recorded exactly like the guitar-based stuff I was doing: multi-tracked recordings of me playing. In late 2005, however, I started delving into software synthesizers and sequencers. I began to learn about programming and constructing songs, rather than recording them.

One of my first experiments was to redo an existing song electronically, using an “acquired” copy of FL (Fruity Loops) Studio. ‘Virgin-Like’ just seemed to lend itself to this kind of treatment. And thus, we got ‘Virgin-Like (Version-Like)’:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

[download 'Virgin-Like (Version-Like)' mp3]

I think the song – in each of its guises – holds up ok. It definitely lacks the emotional drive of some of the other Projects tracks. Indeed, lyrically, it’s rather silly. But I think, sound- and structure-wise, it’s unusual and fun enough to warrant its inclusion.

Or maybe I just felt I needed to include at least one song from 2004/2005 on that compilation…